1. Review Overview
This is a confirmation appraisal. The appraisee completes the substantive self-review first, followed by a concise independent appraiser assessment.
Weighting
Exponential 50% | Voxabot 40% | Sentinel 10%
Within each organisation composite, 75% is role/project delivery and 25% is the shared cross-functional competency score.
Assessment principle
Rating options are deliberately not identical everywhere. Project work, recurring operational work, commercial outcomes, systems implementation and behavioural competencies use the most relevant supporting dropdowns while retaining a common 0-5 score for fair aggregation.
Common scoring scale for role/project outcomes
| Score | Meaning | Calibration |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Exceptional | Agreed outcome substantially exceeded, with high quality, strong ownership and clear positive impact. |
| 4 | Exceeds expectations | Outcome achieved to a consistently strong standard, with initiative and limited supervision. |
| 3 | Meets expectations | Core agreed outcome achieved to the required standard. |
| 2 | Partially meets expectations | Some delivery, with material gaps in timeliness, completeness, quality, ownership or consistency. |
| 1 | Does not meet expectations | Delivery materially below the agreed standard or requiring substantial repeated intervention. |
| 0 | No measurable delivery | No material work product or outcome to assess. |
2. The Exponential Network
Personal Assistant to the GM / General Administration. Organisation weighting: 50%.
Exponential Delivery Review
8 weighted measures3. Voxabot AI Solutions
Systems coordination with strong emphasis on Agency Vault / Morningcrest sales systems, lead conversion and implementation.
Voxabot Delivery Review
9 weighted measures4. Sentinel Automations
Operations lead review covering research, market entry, launch readiness and early operating systems.
Sentinel Delivery Review
5 weighted measures5. Shared Cross-Functional Competencies
Behaviourally anchored ratings are tailored to the quality being assessed rather than repeating a generic dropdown.
How the Work Gets Done
10 weighted competencies6. Automated Score Summary
Scores recalculate instantly as ratings are entered. N/A items are excluded from the relevant denominator.
| Area | Weight | Self delivery | Appraiser delivery | Self composite | Appraiser composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exponential | 50% | - | - | - | - |
| Voxabot | 40% | - | - | - | - |
| Sentinel | 10% | - | - | - | - |
| Shared competencies | 25% of each composite | Self: - | Appraiser: - | ||
7. Overall Review
Appraisee reflection is intentionally more detailed. Appraiser inputs are concise.
8. Confirmation Review Outcome
This section records the outcome of the confirmation review. It is deliberately separate from any future formal performance-improvement process.
9. Review Acknowledgement & Sign-off
Sign-off confirms that the appraisal was reviewed and discussed. It does not necessarily indicate agreement with every rating or comment.
Appraisee
Appraiser / Manager
Form data are stored locally in the browser on the device being used. Use Export Backup or Download Completed HTML for a portable copy. Hosting this static form does not create a central database. If central HR storage or multi-user workflow is required later, the same interface can be connected to a secure backend or approved HR platform.